1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 61 Ohio
  5. 61 Ohio St.3d 528 (1991)
 

STATE FARM AUTO. INS. CO. v. ROSE

No. 90-2399.

61 Ohio St.3d 528 (1991)

STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ROSE, ADMR., ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 21, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs and David W. Hilkert, for petitioner State Farm.

Dennis M. Zavinski, for respondents John Rose et al.

Roetzel & Andress, Ronald B. Lee and Lee A. Schaffer, in support of petitioner for amici curiae, Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. and Meridian Mutual Insurance Co.

HOLMES, J.

The sole issue before us on certification from the federal district court is whether "the language in coverage A, liability coverage, as amended in endorsement 6890AW 1 ["endorsement"] [is] clear and unambiguous so as to limit all derivative death claims of John Rose to a single $50,000.00 recovery?" (Emphasis added.) For the reasons which follow, we answer this query in the affirmative.

The language in the endorsement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases