BUCKO v. FIRST MN. SAV. BANK F.B.S.

No. C8-89-1344.

471 N.W.2d 95 (1991)

Robert BUCKO, et al., Petitioners, Appellants, v. FIRST MINNESOTA SAVINGS BANK, F.B.S. f/k/a First Federal Savings and Loan, Petitioner, Respondent, Charles L. Yeschke, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 7, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James H. Kaster, Nichols, Kaster & Anderson, Minneapolis, for appellants.

James T. Martin, Gislason, Martin & Varpness, Edina, for respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.


TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.

This appeal relates to awards of punitive damages and attorney fees for violations of Minn.Stat. § 181.75, prohibiting employee polygraph testing.

In 1976, the Minnesota Legislature deleted the phrase "by coercion" from the statute prohibiting employers from soliciting or requiring polygraph tests of their employees or prospective employees. See Act of April 13, 1976, ch. 256, § 1, subd. 1, 1976 Minn. Laws 950 codified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases