1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 61 Ohio
  5. 61 Ohio St.3d 501 (1991)
 

KOHMESCHER v. KROGER CO.

No. 90-993.

61 Ohio St.3d 501 (1991)

KOHMESCHER, APPELLANT, v. KROGER COMPANY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 21, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tobias & Kraus, Paul H. Tobias and Willard L. Harvey, for appellant.

Robert G. Stachler and Thomas R. Schuck, for appellee.

Spater, Gittes, Schulte & Kolman, Frederick M. Gittes and Louis A. Jacobs, urging reversal for amicus curiae, National Employment Lawyers Association.

SWEENEY, J.

In his complaint before the court of common pleas, plaintiff alleged that Kroger forced him to retire without just cause and that Kroger discriminated against him on account of his age (sixty years) in violation of R.C. 4101.17.1 The issue presented for our determination is whether summary judgment was properly granted in favor of Kroger and against plaintiff. For the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases