1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 250 N.J.
  5. 250 N.J. Super. 296 (1991)
 

CAMERON & CAMERON, INC. v. PLANNING BD. OF TOWNSHIP OF WARREN

250 N.J. Super. 296 (1991)

593 A.2d 1250

CAMERON & CAMERON, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WARREN, SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 5, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph E. Murray argued the cause for appellant (Murray, MacNeill & Tafaro, attorneys; Joseph E. Murray, of counsel; Jonathan E. Drill and Jay B. Bohn, on the brief).

John C. Phillips argued the cause for respondent (Buttermore, Mullen, Jeremiah & Phillips, attorneys; John C. Phillips, of counsel; John C. Phillips and Laura N. Anderson, on the brief).

Before Judges O'BRIEN, SCALERA and KEEFE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by O'BRIEN, J.A.D.

Cameron & Cameron, Inc. (Cameron), a developer, challenges conditions attached to a preliminary site plan approval granted by respondent Planning Board of the Township of Warren (Board). We reverse and remand.

Cameron owns Lot 11C in Block 322 on the Tax Map of Warren Township, which is triangular shaped and contains 1.18 acres. It is bounded on the north by Lot 11A, which has received preliminary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases