1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 246 N.J.
  5. 246 N.J. Super. 280 (1991)
 

LILLY v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO.

246 N.J. Super. 280 (1991)

587 A.2d 629

MARILYN R. LILLY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 18, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Petras argued the cause for appellant (Weiner Lesniak, attorneys; John T. Petras, of counsel and on the brief).

Thomas E. Hood argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges MICHELS, BRODY and GRUCCIO.

PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment of the Law Division which declared that plaintiff Marilyn R. Lilly was entitled to personal injury protection benefits under a policy of insurance issued by defendant Prudential Insurance Company (more properly referred to as Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company) is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Menza in his written opinion which is reported as Lilly v. Prudential Insurance Company,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases