1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 61 Ohio
  5. 61 Ohio St.3d 456 (1991)
 

STATE, EX REL. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., v. INDUS. COMM.

No. 90-600.

61 Ohio St.3d 456 (1991)

THE STATE, EX REL. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 14, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Russell P. Herrold, Jr., and Bradley K. Sinnott, for appellant.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Michael L. Squillace, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant raises one issue: Does due process compel oral argument, if requested, at a hearing before the Industrial Commission, whenever new evidence is obtained? Upon review, we find that it does not.

Due process clearly entails an "opportunity to be heard." Grannis v. Ordean (1914), 234 U.S. 385, 394, 34 S.Ct. 779, 783, 58 L.Ed. 1363, 1369. However, due process "guarantees no particular form of procedure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases