1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 501 U.S.
  5. 501 U.S. 1 (1991)
 

CONNECTICUT v. DOEHR

No. 90-143.

501 U.S. 1 (1991)

111 S.Ct. 2105

115 L.Ed.2d 1

CONNECTICUT ET AL. v. DOEHR.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 6, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry S. Cohn, Assistant Attorney General of Connecticut, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Clarine Nardi Riddle, Attorney General, Arnold B. Feigin and Carolyn K. Querijero, Assistant Attorneys General, and Andrew M. Calamari.

Joanne S. Faulkner argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Brian Wolfman and Alan B. Morrison.*

JUSTICE WHITE delivered an opinion, Parts I, II, and III of which are the opinion of the Court.†

This case requires us to determine whether a state statute that authorizes prejudgment attachment of real estate without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the person seeking the attachment post a bond, satisfies the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases