1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 61 Ohio
  5. 61 Ohio St.3d 385 (1991)
 

HEMPHILL v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTH

No. 90-2525.

61 Ohio St.3d 385 (1991)

HEMPHILL, APPELLANT, v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 14, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Hemphill, pro se.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Steven W. Ritz, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

We affirm the court of appeals' decision for the reasons stated in its opinion.

In order for a writ of prohibition to lie, three requirements must be satisfied: (1) the court or officer against whom it is sought must be about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, (2) the exercise of such power must be unauthorized by law, and (3) it will result in an injury for which no other adequate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases