1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 245 N.J.
  5. 245 N.J. Super. 188 (1991)
 

PACENTI v. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC.

245 N.J. Super. 188 (1991)

584 A.2d 843

EDWARD J. PACENTI AND PHYLLIS PACENTI, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC., THE JOHANSEN COMPANY, FISHBACH CORP., JOHN DOE AND RICHARD DOE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 8, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony J. Danzo argued the cause for appellants (Ronald Pittore, on the brief).

Kerry M. Parker argued the cause for respondent Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc. (Crummy, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger & Vecchione, attorneys; Kerry M. Parker and Michael P. Hickey on the brief).

David N. Cohen argued cause for respondent The Johansen Company (Budd Larner Gross Rosenbaum Greenberg & Sade, attorneys; Donald P. Jacobs, on the brief).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN and DREIER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals by leave granted from summary judgment entered in favor of defendant Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc. Plaintiff asserts that Hoffman-LaRoche is liable to him in negligence for slip and fall injuries while he was working in the employ of codefendant The Johansen Company. Hoffman-LaRoche contends that plaintiff also was a "special employee" of Hoffman-LaRoche, having worked there as a millwright for over...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases