1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 123 N.J.
  5. 123 N.J. 289 (1991)
 

MATTER OF HUMEN

123 N.J. 289 (1991)

586 A.2d 237

IN THE MATTER OF PETER L. HUMEN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 1, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William R. Wood, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

Mark P. Denbeaux argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding arises out of a presentment filed by the District VI Ethics Committee (DEC) against respondent, Peter Humen, based on his representation of Lillian O'Connell. The DEC found respondent guilty of unethical conduct, and the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) agreed with that finding. A majority of the DRB recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for one year, two...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases