M.P. v. WEE CARE DAY NURSERY OF MAPLEWOOD


250 N.J. Super. 119 (1991)

593 A.2d 799

M.P., AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM D.P., AND D.P., INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. WEE CARE DAY NURSERY OF MAPLEWOOD AND SO. ORANGE, INC., ARLENE SPECTOR, DIANE COSTA, JOHN DOES AND JANE DOE (FICTITIOUS PERSONS), DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 5, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Casella, Carducci, McMichael & Moylen, attorneys for appellants (Gary Wm. Moylen, of counsel and on the brief).

Methfessel & Werbel, attorneys for respondent Wee Care (Stephen G. Sweet on the brief).

Before J.H. COLEMAN, DREIER and LANDAU, Judges.


The opinion of the court was delivered by LANDAU, J.A.D.

On leave granted, plaintiffs M.P., an infant by his guardian ad litem, D.P., and D.P. individually, appeal an in limine order entered in their civil action against defendant-respondent Wee Care Day Nursery of Maplewood and So. Orange, Inc. (Wee Care), and the other captioned defendants-respondents.

Plaintiffs are seeking damages for negligent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases