1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 122 N.J.
  5. 122 N.J. 235 (1991)
 

BANDEL v. FRIEDRICH

122 N.J. 235 (1991)

584 A.2d 800

WILLIAM F. BANDEL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES FRIEDRICH, M.D., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS ASSOCIATES, ZURBRUGG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, JEROME WARREN, M.D., PENNSAUKEN MEDICAL INDUSTRIAL CLINIC, GARDEN STATE COMMUNITY HOSP., (DIVISION OF WEST JERSEY HEALTH SYSTEMS), AND HOWARD L. PRESS, D.O., DEFENDANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 30, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Grossman argued the cause for appellant (Grossman & Kruttschnitt, attorneys).

George H. Hulse argued the cause for respondent (Hulse & Germano, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by HANDLER, J.

Plaintiff, William Bandel, sued several physicians, hospitals, and a health-care institution for their negligence in diagnosing his condition, bacterial endocarditis. By the time of trial, all defendants except Dr. Charles Friedrich had settled with plaintiff or had been dismissed from the case. Finding negligence, the jury assessed Dr. Friedrich's fault at 20%, plaintiff's at 10%, and a second doctor's at 70%...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases