1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 61 Wn.
  5. 61 Wn. App. 295 (1991)
 

CHANNEL v. MILLS

No. 13141-2-II.

61 Wn. App. 295 (1991)

810 P.2d 67

HAROLD CHANNEL, ET AL, Appellants, v. JONATHAN LEE MILLS, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

May 15, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Duane Lansverk and Landerholm, Memovich, Lansverk & Whitesides, Inc., P.S., for appellants.

Norman C. Dick, Odine H. Husemoen, and Walstead, Mertsching, Husemoen, Donaldson & Barlow, P.S., for respondents Mills.

Robert M. Gregg, for respondent Linda Channel.

Keith Anderson, pro se.

ALEXANDER, J.

Harold and Patricia Channel appeal a summary judgment in favor of Jonathan Mills and Keith Anderson, contending that an arbitration award should not have been given collateral estoppel effect. Mills claims that the appeal is frivolous and he requests attorney's fees. We reverse the judgment and deny Mills' claim for fees.

The material facts of this case are not in dispute. On August 30, 1986, two...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases