1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 122 N.J.
  5. 122 N.J. 228 (1991)
 

DIXON VENTURE v. JOSEPH DIXON CRUCIBLE

122 N.J. 228 (1991)

584 A.2d 797

THE DIXON VENTURE, A NEW JERSEY PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE JOSEPH DIXON CRUCIBLE COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DIXON TICONDEROGA COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND THEIR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 30, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julian Wilsey argued the cause for appellants (Greenberg Margolis, attorneys).

David B. Rubin argued the cause for respondent (Rubin, Rubin, Malgran & Kuhn, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons stated in its reported opinion below. 235 N.J.Super. 105, 561 A.2d 663 (1989). We modify the judgment to allow the court below to mold the pleadings to conform to the unique circumstances of this case. The case concerns the status of a purchaser of industrial property who agreed to buy the property during...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases