1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 61 Wn.
  5. 61 Wn. App. 195 (1991)
 

MERIDIAN MINERALS v. KING COUNTY

No. 10322-6-III.

61 Wn. App. 195 (1991)

810 P.2d 31

MERIDIAN MINERALS COMPANY, ET AL, Appellants, v. KING COUNTY, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

As amended by order June 12, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Hempelmann, Alan L. Wallace, and Cairncross, Ragen & Hempelmann, P.S.; Kurt W. Kroschel, Daniel L. Kinerk, and Kurt W. Kroschel & Associates, for appellants.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Ann Schindler, Deputy, for respondent King County.

David Boerner, for respondent Friends of Veazie Valley.

[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals June 12, 1991.]

THOMPSON, J.

Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BNRR) and Meridian Minerals Company (Meridian) appeal a partial summary judgment of the Chelan County Superior Court in favor of King County, its agency, King County Building and Land Development Division (BALD), and Friends of Veazie Valley (Friends). The trial court upheld a decision by BALD refusing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases