1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 948 F.2d
  5. 948 F.2d 1573 (1991)
 

STATE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. MOR-FLO INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 91-1167.

948 F.2d 1573 (1991)

STATE INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOR-FLO INDUSTRIES, INC. and American Appliance Mfg. Corp., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied December 12, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul R. Puerner, Law Offices of Paul R. Puerner, Milwaukee, Wis., argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief, was Daniel D. Ryan, Fuller, Ryan & Hohenfeldt, S.C.

Charles W. Bradley, Davis Hoxie Faithfull & Hapgood, New York City, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief, was Peter H. Priest. Also on the brief, were Ronald I. Weiss, Goodman Weiss Freedman, Cleveland, Ohio.

Before NIES, Chief Judge, RICH and MICHEL, Circuit Judges.

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

State Industries, Inc. ("State") appeals the judgment, unchanged after reconsideration on remand, of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, awarding damages for patent infringement but denying its request for enhanced damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 (1988). State Indus. v. Mor-Flo Indus., 17 USPQ2d 1706, 1990 WL 292151 (E.D.Tenn. 1990). Because the court did not abuse its discretion in denying enhanced...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases