1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 761 F.Supp.
  5. 761 F.Supp. 1420 (1991)
 

MICRO MOTION, INC. v. EXAC CORP.

No. C-89-1825 WHO.

761 F.Supp. 1420 (1991)

MICRO MOTION, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. EXAC CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

February 27, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John O. Tramontine, Jesse J. Jenner, David J. Lee, Fish & Neave, New York City, John W. Keker, Paul V. Carroll, Keker & Brockett, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

Sheldon W. Witcoff, Daniel A. Boehnen, Allegretti & Witcoff, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., Charles B. Cohler, Richard Haas, Lasky, Haas, Cohler & Munter, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

ORRICK, District Judge.

This is the damages phase of a bifurcated patent infringement action involving Coriolis mass flowmeters, which measure the mass flow rate of liquids. Since 1977, plaintiff, Micro Motion, Incorporated ("Micro Motion"), a Colorado corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Emerson Electric Company ("Emerson Electric") since 1984, has manufactured and sold Coriolis mass flowmeters and their accessories. Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases