1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 61 Ohio
  5. 61 Ohio St.3d 155 (1991)
 

WITT CO. v. HAMILTON CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 90-1252.

61 Ohio St.3d 155 (1991)

WITT COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 17, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen Swaim, for appellant.

Arthur M. Ney, Jr., prosecuting attorney, Thomas J. Scheve and Scott C. Kirschman, for appellees.

ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

The issue presented to this court is whether the BTA erred in failing to consider the appraisal report and testimony of appellant's expert witness, Kennedy. Appellant asserts that the BTA erred in refusing to accept or consider the testimony of and appraisal performed by Kennedy. In support, appellant argues that Kennedy was unaware of the contingency fee arrangement between his employer and appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases