1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 774 F.Supp.
  5. 774 F.Supp. 1376 (1991)
 

ROSES INC. v. U.S.

No. 84-05-00632.

774 F.Supp. 1376 (1991)

ROSES INC., California Floral Trade Council, and Floral Trade Council, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Anapromex, Defendant-Intervenor.

United States Court of International Trade.

September 16, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stewart and Stewart, Eugene L. Stewart, Terence P. Stewart and Geert De Prest, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Div., Jeanne E. Davidson, Andrea Fekkes Dynes, Office of the Chief Counsel for Import Admin., U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C., of counsel, for defendant.

Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Leslie A. Glick, Columbus, Ohio, for defendant-intervenor.

OPINION

RESTANI, Judge:

This case is before the court on plaintiffs' motion for judgment on the agency record. Plaintiffs, representatives of United States fresh cut flower producers, contend that in its second remand determination, issued on April 1, 1991, the Department of Commerce ("Commerce") violated this court's instructions contained in the remand order and issued a final negative countervailing duty determination that is not supported by substantial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases