1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 768 F.Supp.
  5. 768 F.Supp. 1343 (1991)
 

SIDCO INDUSTRIES INC. v. WIMAR TAHOE CORP.

Civ. No. 91-110-FR.

768 F.Supp. 1343 (1991)

SIDCO INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. WIMAR TAHOE CORPORATION and William J. Yung, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

June 25, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Pierre Kolisch, Peter E. Heuser, Kolisch, Hartwell, Dickinson, McCormack & Heuser, Portland, Or., for plaintiff.

Steven K. Blackhurst, Jeffrey J. Baker, Ater, Wynne, Hewitt, Dodson & Skerritt, Portland, Or., J. Robert Chambers, Gregory J. Lunn, Wood, Herron & Evans, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendants.

OPINION

FRYE, Judge:

The matter before the court is the motion (# 6) of defendants, Wimar Tahoe Corporation (Wimar) and William J. Yung, to dismiss this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) on the grounds of improper venue, lack of personal jurisdiction, and insufficiency of service of process.

FACTS

This is an action for trademark infringement, alleging violations of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1121, false designation of origin under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases