1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 759 F.Supp.
  5. 759 F.Supp. 1327 (1991)
 

SPANGLER v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.

No. IP 87-1013-C.

759 F.Supp. 1327 (1991)

Burl SPANGLER and Bonnie Spangler, Plaintiffs, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. and Roper Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

March 6, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris L. Klapper, Klapper & Isaac, Indianapolis, Ind., for plaintiffs.

William M. Osborn, Osborn, Hiner & Lisher, Indianapolis, Ind., for defendants.

ENTRY DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECUSAL

TINDER, District Judge.

I. General Background

In the federal courts, a party with a reasonable suspicion that the judge is biased may seek to have the judge removed from the case. In such a situation, the judge is required to retire from the case if "an objective, disinterested observer fully informed of the facts underlying the grounds on which recusal [is] sought would entertain a significant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases