1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 775 F.Supp.
  5. 775 F.Supp. 1126 (1991)
 

SAFFOLD v. CITY OF CHICAGO

No. 91 C 1947.

775 F.Supp. 1126 (1991)

Howard SAFFOLD, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

August 26, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Ehrich Bateman (argued), Timothy W. Wright, III, Sachnoff & Weaver, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

John Roche, Asst. Corp. Counsel, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiff Howard Saffold has brought suit against the City of Chicago ("the City") pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that defendant, without prior notice, has effected a forfeiture of 117 vacation days that plaintiff earned pursuant to a City of Chicago Police Department General Order. The City now moves to dismiss Saffold's single-count complaint.1 As set forth below...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases