1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 780 F.Supp.
  5. 780 F.Supp. 1097 (1991)
 

BERRY v. ARMSTRONG RUBBER CO.

Civ. A. No. J88-0653(B).

780 F.Supp. 1097 (1991)

James BERRY, Sr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARMSTRONG RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division.

July 30, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin E. Kerstine, Jackson, Miss., Jack W. Harang, Stuart H. Smith, New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs.

Robert H. Weaver, Watkins Ludlam & Stennis, Jackson, Miss., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BARBOUR, Chief Judge.

This cause is before the Court on the Motion of Defendant Armstrong Rubber Company ("Armstrong") for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Having considered the Motion together with the supporting and opposing memoranda, exhibits, and documentation, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion of Defendant for Summary Judgment should be granted for the reasons as set...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases