1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 767 F.Supp.
  5. 767 F.Supp. 1081 (1991)
 

McNEIL-PPC, INC. v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.

Civ. A. No. 90-B-2029.

767 F.Supp. 1081 (1991)

McNEIL-PPC, INC., Plaintiff, v. The PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Procter & Gamble Distributing Company and Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

June 18, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick J. Baumann, Peter L. Edwards, Rothgerber, Appel, Powers & Johnson, Denver, Colo., Philip S. Johnson, Dianne B. Elderkin, Lynn B. Borreale, Woodcock Washburn Kurtz Mackiewicz & Norris, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

H. Thomas Coghill, Paul E. Goodspeed, Coghill and Goodspeed, Denver, Colo., Allen H. Gerstein, Carl E. Moore, Jr., Marshall, O'Toole, Gerstein, Murray & Bicknell, Chicago, Ill., Fredrick H. Braun, Larry L. Huston, Procter & Gamble Co., Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BABCOCK, District Judge.

Hearing was held June 13, 1991, on defendants the Procter & Gamble Company, Procter & Gamble Distributing Company and Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company's (P & G) motions for (1) summary judgment on plaintiff McNeil-PPC, Inc.'s (McNeil-PPC) complaint alleging patent infringement and (2) leave to file a request for reexamination of the patent in suit in the Patent and Trademark Office...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases