1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 60 Ohio
  5. 60 Ohio St. 3d 124 (1991)
 

ANDERSON v. OLMSTED UTILITY EQUIP., INC.

No. 90-918.

60 Ohio St. 3d 124 (1991)

ANDERSON ET AL., CROSS-APPELLEES, v. OLMSTED UTILITY EQUIPMENT, INC., APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT; HARVEY HUBBELL CORPORATION, OHIO BRASS DIVISION, ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 5, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin F. White and David F. McLain, for cross-appellees.

Arter & Hadden, Irene C. Keyse-Walker, Margaret H. Joyce and Edward R. Brown, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Quandt, Giffels, Buck & Rodgers Co., L.P.A., Walter R. Matchinga and Hunter Havens, for appellant Harvey Hubbell Corp., Ohio Brass Division.

Rheuban & Palma, Norman A. Rheuban and Robert M. Palma, for appellant Regal Tube Co.

DOUGLAS, J.

I

The first issue presented for our consideration is whether the court of appeals properly concluded that Anderson and Carlson were entitled to recovery against Olmsted based upon claims of strict liability and implied warranty.3

Olmsted argues that strict liability is not a viable cause of action in this case because it is neither a manufacturer nor a seller as required by Section 402A of 2 Restatement of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases