1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 767 F.Supp.
  5. 767 F.Supp. 995 (1991)
 

U.S. v. MANSION HOUSE CENTER

Nos. 76-20C(1), 80-1563C(1) and 90-915C(1).

767 F.Supp. 995 (1991)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. MANSION HOUSE CENTER, et al., Defendants. TOWERS HOTEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Gerald A. RIMMEL, Receiver, Mansion House Center Properties, Defendant. Gerald A. RIMMEL, Receiver, Mansion House Center Properties, Plaintiff, v. TOWERS HOTEL CORPORATION, Defendant/Counterclaimant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. HALLMARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION, Third-Party Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.

July 8, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph B. Moore, Asst. U.S. Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, St. Louis, Mo., J. Christopher Kohn, Atty., Civil Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Donald Flint, Area Counsel, Dept. of Housing & Urban Development, St. Louis, Mo., for U.S.

Lawrence Sanders, Linclay Corp., St. Louis, Mo., Trustee in Bankruptcy.

James Matchefts, Lewis, Rice & Fingersh, Clayton, Mo., for Peter and Gail McCann.

Norha Ryan, Susman, Schermer, Rimmel & Shifrin, Richard Greenberg, Rosenblum, Goldenhersh, Silverstein & Zafft, Clayton, Mo., for Rimmel, Receiver.

Charles Tureen, Gallop, Johnson & Neuman, St. Louis, Mo., for Value Properties.

John Michael Clear, Michael E. Kohn, Erwin Switzer, III, Bryan, Cave, McPheeters & McRoberts, St. Louis, Mo., for Towers Hotel Corp.

Dick Sher, Peper, Martin, Jensen, Maichal & Hetlage, St. Louis, Mo., for Hallmark.

MEMORANDUM

NANGLE, District Judge.

Having considered the parties' briefs, the exhibits before the Court, and the entire record in these matters, and being fully advised in the premises, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

I. The Second Restated Settlement Agreement

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. On January 19, 1984, Towers (by its president, Norman Probstein), the Receiver, and their counsel signed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases