1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 770 F.Supp.
  5. 770 F.Supp. 928 (1991)
 

ROHM AND HAAS CO. v. BROTECH CORP.

Civ.A. No. 90-109-JRR.

770 F.Supp. 928 (1991)

ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BROTECH CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

August 9, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rudolf E. Hutz, N. Richard Powers and Jeffrey B. Bove, Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, Wilmington, Del. (William E. Lambert, III, Rohm & Haas Company, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Josy W. Ingersoll and Vincent J. X. Hedrick, II, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, Wilmington, Del. (Herbert B. Keil and Gerald H. Bjorge, Keil & Weinkauf, Washington, D.C., Paul R. Rosen and Niels Korup, Spector Gadon & Rosen, P.C., Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for defendant.

OPINION

ROTH, Circuit Judge.*

Rohm and Haas Company ("R & H") brought this action against Brotech Corporation ("Brotech") alleging that Brotech has willfully infringed four patents owned by R & H. While this Court has yet to confront the underlying patent issues involved in this case, since the time this suit was filed in March, 1990, every issue raised has been violently contested, and every step of this litigation has...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases