1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 820 P.2d
  5. 820 P.2d 838 (1991)
 

HICKMAN CONST. v. SOUTH UMPQUA STATE BANK

CV89-0193; CA A66304.

820 P.2d 838 (1991)

109 Or.App. 527

HICKMAN CONSTRUCTION, Inc., and Funderburk Construction, Inc., Appellants, v. SOUTH UMPQUA STATE BANK, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 13, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas F. Spaulding, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellants.

Inge D. White, Roseburg, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dan W. Clark and Dole, Coalwell & Clark, P.C., Roseburg.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DE MUNIZ, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action for intentional interference with business relations, contending that defendant bank wrongfully repossessed plaintiffs' equipment and thereby prevented them, as joint venturers, from performing a road maintenance project for the United States Army. The trial court directed a verdict for defendant. Plaintiffs appeal, and we reverse.

John Hickman is the principal of plaintiff Hickman Construction, Inc...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases