1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 61 Wn.
  5. 61 Wn. App. 103 (1991)
 

O'CONNELL & ASSOCS. v. TRANSAMERICA

No. 10778-7-III.

61 Wn. App. 103 (1991)

809 P.2d 231

JAMES F. O'CONNELL & ASSOCIATES, ET AL, Appellants, v. TRANSAMERICA INDEMNITY COMPANY, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

April 30, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tim M. Higgins, Stephen L. Farnell, and Winston & Cashatt, for appellants.

Michael Myers, Robert T. Carter, and Randall & Danskin, P.S.; Carl J. Oreskovich and Hemovich, Nappi, Oreskovich & Butler, for respondent.

MUNSON, J.

James F. O'Connell & Associates, James F. O'Connell, and Sharon O'Connell (Mr. O'Connell) appeal the summary judgment dismissing their complaint and granting Transamerica Indemnity Company's1 request for a declaration it is not required to provide coverage for them. Mr. O'Connell contends (1) material issues of fact preclude summary judgment, and (2) Transamerica's defense based on allegations of misrepresentation is precluded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases