1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 764 F.Supp.
  5. 764 F.Supp. 838 (1991)
 

McNALLY v. YARNALL

No. 90 Civ. 3076 (RWS).

764 F.Supp. 838 (1991)

Sean M. McNALLY and Janet McNally, Plaintiffs, v. James YARNALL and the Metropolitan Museum of Art, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 8, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stryker, Tams & Dill by Christopher W. Hyde, Kathleen J. Olear, Scott B. Stolbach, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Lord Day & Lord, Barrett Smith by John J. Loflin, M. Breeze McMennamin, of counsel, New York City, for defendants.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant the Metropolitan Museum of Art (the "Museum") has moved pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment of the claims brought against it by Sean and Janet McNally (the "McNallys") in their defamation action against the Museum and James Yarnall ("Yarnall"). For the reasons set forth below, the Museum's motion is granted in part and denied in part.

The Parties

The McNallys are residents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases