1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 772 F.Supp.
  5. 772 F.Supp. 817 (1991)
 

WIESMAN v. METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART

No. 91 Civ. 1754 (WK).

772 F.Supp. 817 (1991)

Constance WIESMAN, Plaintiff, v. The METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 4, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Janet C. Neschis, Leavy Rosensweig & Hyman, New York City, for plaintiff.

Charles H. Kaplan, Whitman & Ransom (Alice B. Stock, on brief, of counsel), New York City, for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.

This action arises out of a claim that the defendant violated provisions of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Invoking pendant jurisdiction, the complaint also alleges that the defendant's actions violated provisions of New York's Human Rights Laws, New York Executive Law § 296, et seq. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), defendant now moves to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases