1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 819 P.2d
  5. 819 P.2d 767 (1991)
 

LASITER v. SAIF

88-10337; CA A64095.

819 P.2d 767 (1991)

109 Or.App. 464

In the matter of the Compensation of James R. LASITER, Claimant. James R. Lasiter, Petitioner, v. SAIF Corporation and Welch Trucking, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 30, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen M. Werner, Eugene, argued the cause, for petitioner. With her on the brief, were Robert F. Webber, and Black, Chapman & Webber, Medford.

David L. Runner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondents. With him on the brief, were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and DEITS, J.

DEITS, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of a final order of the Workers' Compensation Board that dismissed his claim for compensation because, in an earlier compliance proceeding, his alleged employer was found not to be a subject employer under the Workers' Compensation Law. We affirm.

On December 8, 1987, claimant filed an occupational disease claim against Patricia Sue Welch, dba Welch Trucking. Claimant drove a truck owned by Welch that had been leased to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases