1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 816 P.2d
  5. 816 P.2d 700 (1991)
 

STEVENS v. BISPHAM

A8904-02189; CA A64459.

816 P.2d 700 (1991)

108 Or.App. 588

William A. STEVENS and Janice Stevens, Appellants, v. Joseph D. BISPHAM, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 4, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Gernant, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Steven L. Myers and Myers & Knapp, Portland.

Janice M. Stewart, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were McEwen, Gisvold, Rankin & Stewart, Portland.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.

WARREN, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs William Stevens and Janice Stevens brought this action against William's former criminal defense attorney. William alleged legal malpractice, and Janice, his wife, alleged loss of consortium. William appeals from a summary judgment that was based on his failure to file his complaint within the time required by the Statute of Limitations.1 ORS 12.110(1). Defendant purports to cross-assign error to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases