1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 779 F.Supp.
  5. 779 F.Supp. 717 (1991)
 

LEES v. CASE-HOYT CORP.

Civ. No. 90-0163L.

779 F.Supp. 717 (1991)

Maxine Kilkenny LEES, Plaintiff, v. The CASE-HOYT CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

December 23, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irene K. Dymkar, Dymkar & Brandt, Rochester, N.Y., for plaintiff.

Ted H. Williams, Scolaro, Shulman, Cohen, Lawler & Burstein, Syracuse, N.Y., for defendant.

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant Case-Hoyt Corporation's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Maxine Lees filed this action against her former employer, Case-Hoyt, alleging race and sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. For the reasons stated below, defendant's motion for summary judgment on the claim of wage discrimination is denied, and defendant's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases