1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 789 F.Supp.
  5. 789 F.Supp. 667 (1991)
 

BAKER v. EMERY WORLDWIDE

No. CA89-1387.

789 F.Supp. 667 (1991)

Patricia A. BAKER, Plaintiff, v. EMERY WORLDWIDE, a C.F. Corporation, d/b/a Purolator Courier Corporation d/b/a Emery Purolator.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

October 28, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Ernsberger, Behrend and Ernsberger, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Richard J. Antonelli, Buchanan Ingersoll, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEE, District Judge.

In her Complaint, the plaintiff, Patricia A. Baker, brought discrimination claims against the defendant, Emery Purolator (Purolator), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-3, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5 and 28 U.S.C. 1331, and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 P.S. 951. Plaintiff alleges defendant's decision not to hire her as a courier constitutes discrimination in that Purolator engaged in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases