1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 763 F.Supp.
  5. 763 F.Supp. 672 (1991)
 

REID v. GRUNTAL & CO., INC.

No. 90-0062.

763 F.Supp. 672 (1991)

Rosemary REID, Plaintiff, v. GRUNTAL & CO., INC., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Maine.

May 17, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter J. DeTroy, Christopher C. Taintor, Norman Hanson & DeTroy, Portland, Me., for plaintiff.

Andrew J. Bernstein, G. Steven Rowe, Portland, Me., for First UNUM Life Ins. Co.

Rufus Brown, Drummond, Woodsum, Plimpton & MacMahon, Portland, Me., for Gruntal & Co.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT GRUNTAL'S MOTION IN LIMINE

GENE CARTER, Chief Judge.

Defendant Gruntal & Co., Inc. (hereinafter Gruntal) moves to exclude all evidence regarding consequential damages which may be submitted by Plaintiff Rosemary Reid at trial. This motion in limine presents the question of whether the phrase "other appropriate equitable relief" contained in 29 U.S.C. section 1132(a)(3)(B) may be interpreted to permit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases