1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 772 F.Supp.
  5. 772 F.Supp. 662 (1991)
 

TOPURIDZE v. U.S. INFORMATION AGENCY

Civ. A. No. 86-3121(CRR).

772 F.Supp. 662 (1991)

Georgy TOPURIDZE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY, Defendant, and Author Doe, Defendant-Intervenor.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

August 20, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl V. Angelis, Katherine Garrett, Michael J. Kator and Joseph Scott of Kator, Scott & Heller, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., District of Columbia, John D. Bates, Robert E.L. Eaton, Jr. and R. Craig Lawrence, Asst. U.S. Attys., District of Columbia, for defendant.

Myron J. Mintz and Woody N. Peterson of Dickstein, Shapiro & Morin, Washington, D.C., for defendant-intervenor.

OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

In this Privacy Act suit, the privacy interests of the author of a letter are diametrically opposed to the right to access of the subject of that letter. Before the Court is the Motion for Reconsideration filed by the United States Information Agency ("USIA") pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). After carefully considering the instant motion, the underlying law, the submissions of the parties, and the entire record herein...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases