1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 61 Ohio
  5. 61 Ohio St.3d 64 (1991)
 

FURBAY v. TUSCARAWAS CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 90-1366.

61 Ohio St.3d 64 (1991)

FURBAY, APPELLEE, v. TUSCARAWAS COUNTY BD. OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 3, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Veda Furbay, pro se.

Teaford, Rich, Belskis, Coffman & Wheeler and Jeffrey A. Rich, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

For the reasons set forth in Renner v. Tuscarawas Cty. Bd. of Revision (1991), 59 Ohio St.3d 142, 572 N.E.2d 56, we reverse the BTA's decision.

Furbay did not sustain her burden of proving what part of the subject property "was converted to mining and what part continues to qualify for CAUV." Renner, supra, at 145, 572 N.E.2d at 58. The board does not have a duty to investigate a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases