1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 779 F.Supp.
  5. 779 F.Supp. 473 (1991)
 

CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC. v. VERILOG, S.A.

No. C-91-1369 SAW.

779 F.Supp. 473 (1991)

CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. VERILOG, S.A. and Verilog U.S.A., Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

December 23, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, James Warren, Ina Risman, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

Strasburger & Price, John Cone, Dallas, Tex., Graham & James, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEIGEL, District Judge.

I. MOTION TO DISMISS

Cal.Code Civ.Pro. § 410.10 provides, in pertinent part, that California state courts may exercise jurisdiction "on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or of the United States." Federal district courts situated in California are subject to the same jurisdictional limitations. In order to satisfy these Constitutional requirements, the following must...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases