DEPT. OF AGR. AND CONS. SERV. v. SCHICK

No. 90-1921.

580 So.2d 648 (1991)

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, Appellant, v. Marjorie SCHICK, Robert Schick, Buck Hull and Dot Hull Shaw, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 29, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clinton H. Coulter, Jr., Tallahassee, for appellant.

Randall E. Denker, of Lehrman & Denker, Tallahassee, for appellees.


ERVIN, Judge.

Appellant, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (Department), seeks review of the lower court's order directing it to pay attorney's fees to appellees, Robert and Marjorie Schick, Buck Hull, and Dot Hull Shaw, in an inverse condemnation action. Appellant specifically complains of the trial court's use and application of a Rowe1 risk multiplier. Appellees have also cross-appealed regarding proper application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases