1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 761 F.Supp.
  5. 761 F.Supp. 458 (1991)
 

MOTOROLA, INC. v. CHAPMAN

Civ. A. No. H-89-2706.

761 F.Supp. 458 (1991)

MOTOROLA, INC., Plaintiff, v. Howard B. CHAPMAN and Robert B. Cole, Defendants, v. Hal BROCK and Mason McCloud, Third-Party Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division.

April 12, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles L. Babcock, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff.

J. Douglas Sutter, Houston, Tex., for defendants.

OPINION ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HUGHES, District Judge.

Chapman and Cole's motion to remand will be denied because they have no cause of action against the two non-diverse parties they attempted to join in the lawsuit. Chapman and Cole's fraud claim will be dismissed because they lack standing to bring the action. Motorola's motion for summary judgment on the guaranties will be granted because Chapman and Cole failed to pay as required under them and there are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases