1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 231 Cal.App.3d
  5. 231 Cal.App.3d 976 (1991)
 

WILDENSTEN v. EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DIST.

Docket No. A048056.

231 Cal.App.3d 976 (1991)

283 Cal. Rptr. 13

MARY V. WILDENSTEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

June 11, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Curran & Alschuler and Donald W. Curran for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Wendel, Rosen, Black, Dean & Levitan, Les A. Hausrath and Deidre E. Taber for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

BENSON, J.

Plaintiff Mary V. Wildensten appeals from the judgment entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer to her first amended complaint without leave to amend. The trial court ruled that Wildensten failed to state a cause of action for inverse condemnation. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The relevant allegations of Wildensten's first amended complaint are as follows: "3. That at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases