1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 772 F.Supp.
  5. 772 F.Supp. 434 (1991)
 

HANDLE v. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK

Civ. No. LR-C-90-613.

772 F.Supp. 434 (1991)

James HANDLE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, W.D.

August 20, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert R. Cortinez, Cortinez Law Firm, Little Rock, Ark., for plaintiff.

Victra L. Fewell, City Attorney's Office, Little Rock, Ark., for defendants.

ORDER

ROY, District Judge.

On April 30, 1991, the Court directed the plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint. The Court also directed the parties to advise the Court as to whether the Court could proceed with consideration of the pending dispositive motions as they were then presented, or whether the filing of the Second Amended Complaint required new motions to be filed.

On May 28, 1991, the defendants filed additional motions to dismiss and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases