STATE v. BRIGHT

No. C4-90-1685.

471 N.W.2d 708 (1991)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Duane Eddie BRIGHT, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied August 1, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Michael O. Freeman, Hennepin County Atty., Lisa A. Berg, Asst. County Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Susan L.P. Hauge, Asst. State Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by FOLEY, P.J., and HUSPENI and AMUNDSON, JJ.


OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Appellant Duane Eddie Bright challenges his conviction of a second degree controlled substance crime, arguing the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict and that prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument deprived him of a fair trial. We affirm.

FACTS

On October 4, 1989, Minneapolis police responded to a neighborhood complaint that two people were selling drugs near the intersection of Golden Valley...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases