1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 755 F.Supp.
  5. 755 F.Supp. 423 (1991)
 

ALUMAX, INC. v. U.S.

Court Nos. 90-03-00147, 90-07-00346.

755 F.Supp. 423 (1991)

ALUMAX, INC., Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant.

United States Court of International Trade.

January 29, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neville, Peterson & Williams, John M. Peterson and Peter J. Allen, New York City, for plaintiff.

Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, Intern. Trade Field Office, New York City, Bruce N. Stratvert, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant.

OPINION

RESTANI, Judge:

Defendant moves to strike Court of International Trade (CIT) Rule 41(a) notices of voluntary dismissal filed in these actions. CIT Rule 41(a) states that dismissal may be noticed by plaintiff without consent or permission of the court any time before an answer is filed. Following oral argument on January 23, 1991, the court denied the motion to strike the CIT Rule 41(a) dismissals.

These motions are an outgrowth of Eastalco...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases