1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 785 F.Supp.
  5. 785 F.Supp. 366 (1991)
 

JUDGE v. CITY OF NEW YORK

No. 85 Civ. 9740 (CHT).

785 F.Supp. 366 (1991)

Curtis JUDGE, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, the Police Department of the City of New York, and "John Doe," a Fictitious name Intended to Represent a Police Officer of the Police Department of the City of New York Whose Identity is Unknown, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 2, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, New York City (Cynthia A. Fissel, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Victor A. Kovner, Corp. Counsel of the City of New York (Blanche Greenfield, Randie M. Liss, of counsel), for defendants.

OPINION

TENNEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the defendants violated his civil rights during the course of his arrest and incarceration. Defendants now move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Curtis Judge ("Judge") alleges the following facts surrounding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases