1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 765 F.Supp.
  5. 765 F.Supp. 349 (1991)
 

U.S. v. HATCHETT

Crim. No. A-89-CR-81.

765 F.Supp. 349 (1991)

UNITED STATES of America v. Saxon Hugh HATCHETT, John Edward Soto, Rafael Soto, Simon Soto.

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division.

As Amended July 29, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Marshall, U.S. Atty.'s Office, Austin, Tex., for plaintiff U.S.

Bill Willms, Small, Craig & Werkenthin, Austin, Tex., for defendant Saxon Hugh Hatchett.

Gary Zausmer, Bankston, Wright & Greenhill, Austin, Tex., for defendant John Edward Soto.

Connie Kelley, Austin, Tex., for defendant Rafael Soto.

David Deaderick, Tulk & Deaderick, Austin, Tex., for defendant Simon Soto.

ORDER

NOWLIN, District Judge.

On May 29, 1991 all defendants in this cause came on for resentencing in light of the Fifth Circuit's opinion, 923 F.2d 369, issued as mandate February 21, 1991. While this Court's calculation of the various sentencing guideline ranges and rulings on objections to the presentence investigation report were in all things affirmed as to each defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases