1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 774 F.Supp.
  5. 774 F.Supp. 266 (1991)
 

FINEMAN v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.

Civ. A. No. 84-3837.

774 F.Supp. 266 (1991)

Elliot FINEMAN and The Industry Network Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

June 25, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven M. Kramer, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Crummy, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger & Vecchione by John J. Gibbons, Newark, N.J. (Laurence H. Tribe, of counsel), Cambridge, Mass., Stryker, Tams & Dill by Edith K. Payne, Newark, N.J., Covington & Burling, by J. Randolph Wilson, Washington, D.C., for defendant.

OPINION

BISSELL, District Judge.

I. FACTS AND BACKGROUND

The present matter arises pursuant to several remaining motions in this action. First, defendant Armstrong has moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 for a new trial, as an alternative to its motion for J.N.O.V. Second, Armstrong has separately moved under Rule 49 (pertaining to inconsistent verdicts) for a new trial. Finally, the plaintiffs have moved for "reformation of the judgment," requesting this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases