1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 116 Wn.2d
  5. 116 Wn.2d 911 (1991)
 

STATE v. McKINSEY

No. 57423-5.

116 Wn.2d 911 (1991)

810 P.2d 907

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DAVID McKINSEY, Petitioner.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

May 16, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Burns and Dana Griffin Burns, for petitioner.

Donald C. Brockett, Prosecuting Attorney, and James R. Sweetser, Deputy, for respondent.

BRACHTENBACH, J.

At issue is whether a prior conviction for first degree possession of stolen property is per se admissible for impeachment purposes under ER 609(a)(2). We hold that it is, and affirm the courts below.

Defendant David McKinsey was charged with first degree trafficking in stolen property and two counts of burglary. He was convicted of the lesser included offense of second degree trafficking in stolen property. Through a pretrial motion in limine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases