1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 781 F.Supp.
  5. 781 F.Supp. 195 (1990)
 

CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY v. LOCKFORMER CO.

Nos. 86 Civ. 0457 (JSM), 88 Civ. 0742 (JSM).

781 F.Supp. 195 (1990)

CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. The LOCKFORMER COMPANY, INC., Defendant. CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. The LOCKFORMER COMPANY, INC., Met-Coil Systems Corp., Mechanical Data, Inc., Estimation, Inc., Lion International Company, d/b/a Orange Systems, and Orange Systems/Lockformer, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

Opinion on Motions for Judgment Notwithstanding Verdict September 24, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George E. Badenoch, Edward W. Greason, John Flock, Mark D. Giarratana, James E. Geringer, Donna L. Angotti and Kenyon & Kenyon, and Irwin P. Underweiser and Underweiser & Underweiser, New York City, for plaintiff Const. Technology, Inc.

Sheldon Karon, Lawrence A. Wojcik, Sharon R. Barner, Kevin Tottis and Keck, Mahin & Cate, Chicago, Ill., Victor G. Savikas and Keck, Mahin & Cate, Los Angeles, Cal., and Robert J. Schecter and Keck, Mahin, Cate & Koether, New York City, for defendants Lockformer Co. and Met-Coil Systems Corp.

Clarence J. Fleming, Robert M. Mason and Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue were also counsel for defendants Lockformer Co. and Met-Coil Systems Corp. prior to trial.

Gary S. Jacobson, Kristine M. Reddington and Jacobson & Triggs, New York City, for defendant Mechanical Data, Inc.

Stephen H. Galebach, Gregory J. Granitto and West & Galebach, Gaithersburg, Md., and David J. Grais, Kaare Phillips and Grais & Phillips, New York City, for defendant Lion Intern. Inc., d/b/a Orange Systems, Inc.

Robert R. Bowie, Jr., Towson, Md., for defendant Estimation Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MARTIN, Jr., District Judge:

This matter is before the Court on three motions brought by certain defendants in the above-referenced actions. A fourth motion, brought by defendant The Lockformer Company, Inc. ("Lockformer"), for summary judgment as to the validity of the patents at issue in this litigation is addressed in a separate Opinion of the Court.

With respect to defendant Met-Coil Systems Corp.'s motion for summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases